Suara.com – Musician Fiersa Besari also commented on the flow of funds to influencers in the 2024 presidential election season. Even though it wasn't clear, the artist emphasized that he was not a buzzer.
It all started with a tweet by artist Ananda Badudu which was re-shared by Fiera Besari. The tweet alludes to the documentary film Dirty Vote which is currently viral on social media.
“Let's make a version of Dirty Vote that reveals the flow of funds to influencers,” tweeted Ananda Badudu on the X (twitter) account @anandabadudu on Sunday (11/2/2024).
Then, Fiersa re-shared Ananda Badudu's tweet. He also agreed that there should be a film 'Dirty Voite' to reveal the flow of funds to influencers.
“Agree, I'm curious, is it paid? Or is it really based on conscience?” tweeted Fiersa via the @FiersaBesari account, Tuesday (13/2/2024).
Firsa admitted that she was annoyed because a number of people accused her of being a buzzer. “I'm really annoyed, there are some people who say I'm a buzzer, even though I've never received any funds, and even if there were funds, I wouldn't accept them,” he stressed.
After that, Firsa tweeted again, touching on the question of self-esteem that cannot be paid. According to him, being critical is one way to love this country.
“I'm not a rich person. I'm not someone whose way of life is right. But I know that my self-respect and moral compass cannot be bought. Being critical is a form of loving this country, and loving this country is different from loving this country's politicians,” he said.
Fiersa Besari's tweet was also widely commented on by netizens. There are those who agree and quite a few also hold other views.
“Everyone has the right to criticize anyone they think is wrong. Let's all don't think that critical people are buzzers or receive payment,” said @Aidil***.
“5 M, bro?” asked @AchmadRam***.
“No, I already have that much,” replied @FiersaBesari
“Up!! Agree and curious too. The problem is that there are influencers who act stupidly for presidential candidates if they don't have the money, what's the point,” wrote @neoirw.
“Then what do you want to do with getting paid, bro? As my mother said, don't interfere in other people's affairs. For example, if he gets money, that's a matter for God, for example if the President is elected, which means it's God's will, bro,” said @orini9** *.
“Dude, why are you being sarcastic like this, try to prove it bro, starting from the INFLUENCER PASLON 1, PASLON 2, PASLON 3, they all have their own INFLUENCER, try to prove it bro, I'm curious,” said @outof***.
It is known that the presence of the documentary film Dirty Vote ahead of voting day 14 February 2024 has indeed caused a stir on social media. In fact, the Prabowo-Gibran camp rushed to clarify the contents of the film, calling it slander.
The film Dirty Vote was directed by Dandhy Laksono. The contents of the film tell about the facts behind the alleged fraud in the 2024 elections. Until now, Dirty Vote is still a trending topic on social media X (Twitter).
The film presents 3 practitioners, lecturers and legal experts, namely Bivitri Susanti, Feri Amsari, and Zainal Arifin Mochtar. They revealed a number of data and evidence of fraud in the 2024 presidential election.
The film Dirty Vote also presents information about irregularities in the process of nominating Cawapres Gibran Rakabuming Raka and exposing the interference of the President of the Republic of Indonesia, Joko Widodo (Jokowi) by violating a number of regulations.
As of Tuesday (13/2/2024), the film Dirty Vote had been watched by 6 million people.