After being questioned for six hours in relation to the David abuse case, AG, Mario Dandy’s girlfriend, was officially detained at the LPKS
Suara.com – The Renakta Sub-Directorate of the Ditreskrimum Polda Metro Jaya has officially detained a child in conflict with the AG law (15) regarding the abuse case of David (17). The girlfriend of the suspect Mario Dandy Satriyo (20) was detained after being questioned for six hours.
Polda Metro Jaya Direskrimum Kombes Pol Hengki Haryadi said, AG’s detention was carried out with various considerations and referred to the Child Protection Law.
“From the results of our examination for about six hours, we once again considered the child’s comfort tonight, we decided from the investigators then to make an arrest and proceed with detention,” said Hengki at Polda Metro Jaya, Jakarta on Wednesday (8/3/2023 ) Evening.
Hengki explained that AG’s detention would be carried out at the Cipayung Social Welfare Administration (LPKS), East Jakarta. The detention was carried out for the next seven days.
Also Read: Getting better! David Enters the Emotional Recovery Phase
“If later it is not enough, the prosecutor can extend it for another 8 days,” explained Hengki.
Checked Since Morning
AG was examined by investigators from the Sub-Directorate of Renakta of the Ditreskrimum Polda Metro Jaya since 10.00 WIB this morning.
Kabid Humas Polda Metro Jaya Kombes Pol Trunoyudo Wisnu Andiko said the examination process for AG as a child in conflict with the law was accompanied by Community Advisors from Correctional Centers (PK-Bapas) and the Ministry of Women’s Empowerment and Child Protection (KemenPPPA).
“Because the AG child is in conflict with the law, in addition to the lawyer concerned, he will be assisted by PK-Bapas, a companion from the Ministry of Women’s Empowerment and Child Protection, as an institution that provides protection for children who are in conflict with the law,” he said.
Also Read: Up to 500 Billion Transactions Found! Rafael Alun Trisambodo’s account is blocked
Involved in Persecution
On a previous occasion, Hengki had provided evidence related to AG’s involvement in the David abuse case. This evidence includes WhatsApp or WA messages to CCTV footage confiscated from around the scene of the incident.
Hengki said, based on the evidence, investigators decided to upgrade AG’s status to that of a child in conflict with the law or the perpetrator.
The use of this term applies to minors who cannot be named as suspects like adults.
“After we adjusted it to the CCTV, we adjusted it with other evidence, we adjusted it to the WA chat, all of its roles were depicted there. Therefore, what we said earlier there was an increase in the status of children in conflict with the law to children in conflict with the law or perpetrators,” said Hengki at Polda Metro Jaya, Jakarta, Thursday (2/3/2023).
Based on this series of evidence, continued Hengki, investigators also discovered that there was planning. So that the investigator then applied Article 355 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code regarding the planned persecution.
“We see here that from digital evidence that there was planning from the start. When we started calling SL (the suspect Shane), then met SL then when the three of us were in the car (Mario, Shane and AG) there was a mens rea intention there,” Henki explained.
Fooling South Jakarta Police Investigators
Hengki also revealed that the suspects Mario, Shane Lukas Rotua Pangondian Lumbantoruan (19), and AG had lied when they were questioned by South Jakarta Police investigators. To investigators, Mario Cs initially admitted that this incident was a fight, not persecution.
“We need to explain here, it turned out that at the beginning these suspects or the people at the TKP did not provide true information,” said Hengki
However, said Hengki, Mario and friends did not move or could not avoid it when investigators presented evidence related to their involvement in the case of the persecution of David. This evidence includes CCTV footage, WhatsApp or WA chats, to videos on one of the perpetrators’ mobile phones.
“All the roles are depicted there,” said Hengki.
The case of the persecution of David has been taken over by the Sub-Directorate for Renakta of the Ditreskrimum Polda Metro Jaya. From the results of the case title, investigators have also changed the construction of the article that was previously applied by South Jakarta Metro Police investigators.
Hengki explained that the suspect Mario was charged with Article 355 of the Criminal Code, Paragraph 1 Subsidiary 354 Paragraph 1 of the Criminal Code, more Subsidiary 353 Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code, especially Subsidiary 351 Paragraph 2 of the Criminal Code and or 76 C Juncto 80 Law Number 35 of 2012 concerning Child Protection with maximum threats. 12 years in prison.
Meanwhile, the suspect Shane was charged with Article 355 Paragraph 1 Juncto 56 of the Criminal Code, Subsidiary 354 Paragraph 1 Juncto 56 of the Criminal Code, more Subsidiary 353 Paragraph 2 Juncto 56 of the Criminal Code, more Subsidiary 351 Paragraph 2 Juncto 56 of the Criminal Code and or 76 C Juncto 80 Law Number 35 of 2012 concerning Child Protection with a maximum threat of 12 years in prison.
While children in conflict with the AG law are charged with Article 76 C Juncto Article 80 Law Number 35 Years of Child Protection and or 355 Paragraph 1 Juncto 56 of the Criminal Code, more Subsidiary 353 Paragraph 2 Juncto 56 of the Criminal Code, more or less Subsidiary 351 Paragraph 2 Juncto 56 of the Criminal Code. For his actions, AG is threatened with a maximum sentence of 4 years in prison after reducing half of the maximum threat and reducing it by one third as stipulated in Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning Juvenile Justice.